The Stack: James Comey Indicted and the Weaponization of Government

PoliticsRule of Law
Written By Todd Huff
Podcast episode cover for The Todd Huff Show titled James Comey Indicted, featuring bold typography on a dark background with symbolic imagery of justice and government.

Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted on two federal counts — lying to Congress and obstruction of a congressional proceeding. In today’s episode, Todd Huff explores what this means for justice in America and the risks of weaponizing government against political opponents.

Todd explains how grand juries differ from trial juries and why those distinctions matter in preserving fairness in a free society. He emphasizes that true rule of law must cut both ways: while we must resist the temptation to pursue political retribution, we must also reject the idea that political elites are beyond accountability.

The episode also unpacks a long pattern of selective enforcement and government abuse, from IRS targeting of Tea Party groups, to the Steele dossier and Russia collusion investigation, to suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story and Big Tech censorship. Context, balance, and truth remain central to the conservative-not-bitter approach.

Todd warns that the U.S. cannot afford a justice system that protects elites on one side while weaponizing the law against those on the other. Instead, Americans must demand fairness, accountability, and a return to principles that safeguard liberty.

👉 Keep in Touch: Subscribe to The Daily Truth, Book Todd, or shop Freedom Marketplace

🎧 Listen to Today’s Episode

📝 Transcript: James Comey Indicted and the Weaponization of Government

The Todd Huff Show – September 29, 2025

Host: Todd Huff

Todd Huff: Attention. You're listening to the Todd Huff show, America's home for conservative, not bitter. Talk and education. Be advised. The content of this program has been documented to prevent and even cure liberalism and listening may cause you to lean to the right.

Todd Huff: And now, coming to you from the full sweet wealth studios, here's your conservative but not bitter host Todd Huff well, that is right, my friends. Conservative, not bitter. Indeed. It's a pleasure to be here today. Thank you for joining us. Hope you had a nice weekend. We did.

Todd Huff: As well. We did as well. I'm assuming you did, but it's going to be back here as always. You'll know last week I just returned on Friday. We had been out of town. And just returned for Friday. So back at it behind the microphone here today.

Todd Huff: And it is a pleasure to be here. I want to talk about James. Comey's indictment today. That's what I want to get to on today's. Program. A lot of things I want to get to regarding this. And I think at its core, what we want to discuss here is.

Todd Huff: The difference? Well. I guess two things that I think. Two things that. Are. There's two sources of pressure. Number one. You don't want to politicize something and go after your political opponents.

Todd Huff: For unjustified or political causes. At the same time, you don't want to. Have one side or one group of people be able. Without any. Sort of. Regard for the law, and then once they no longer have the ability to do so, to not be held accountable. And so that's the question that we want to get into today, where is that line? How do we address.

Todd Huff: This. And we're going to do our best today, my friends. Again, it's good. To be back here.

(Sponsor: 48 Financial — https://48financial.com/todd)

Todd Huff: Program brought to you in part by our friends at four eight financial for instake about this for just a moment. Our investments, they're like seeds that we plant. You know this. They grow.

Todd Huff: They multiplied. But are they bearing the type of fruit? That we want at four eight financial. They believe your money should reflect your values. They specialize in wealth management and biblically responsible investing.

Todd Huff: Screening out companies that do not align with your faith. It's all part of what they call their purpose. Centered financial planning, helping you live a life of meaning and purpose. Want to see if. Your current investments align with your values, or to what degree that they do all you have to do is visit 40 eightfinancial.com. todd that's four. Eightfinancial.com Todd 48 financial they're here to worry about your money so that.

Todd Huff: You do not have to, all right? So that being said, my friends, James Comey. Has been indicted. He's been indicted on. Two counts. One is a false statement to Congress, the other is obstruction of a congressional proceeding.

Todd Huff: The basis for these charges is a. 2020 Senate testimony where James Comey. Denied authorizing anyone at the FBI to be an anonymous source. Prosecutors have found or alleged that. This was false and designed to impede.

Todd Huff: The hearing. And so this went to a grand jury. Now let's talk about. A grand jury for a moment because this is important. Congress, the framers, the founders, the people who help build this country were smart enough to understand. That.

Todd Huff: This political abuses could happen in a country. Of course, I would maintain it's probably part of human nature. So whenever someone. Is in political power, they might have an inclination to go after those with whom they disagree because.

Todd Huff: If you can criminalize disagreement or if you can effectively. Turn into criminals. Those who disagree with you. Then the ability to win political fights in your country becomes easier, especially if you can completely outlaw those. That is an atrocious way to behave in a free society. We don't.

Todd Huff: Want this. We don't want every four years or every election cycle there to be a different cast of characters that are targeted by. Our government, by the federal government, by any government. Government. That's a terrible thing. And so that's one of the reasons why one of the many reasons why.

Todd Huff: We have a jury of our peers. In fact. I've seen, and it's comical. I saw one guy do a video where he talked about being on a jury, and he said something like, what do you want me to be? On a jury for man. I'm working 40 hours a week down at the local grocery store or wherever he was. Working. You want me to get into a group of twelve people with a banker?

Todd Huff: With a housewife. With someone. Who's a blue collar worker? Some white collar workers, some retired folks. And you want me? To decide if some random guy is guilty of a crime? No, man. I mean, I don't. Know what I'm doing.

Todd Huff: This is how some people think. Now, I know. I want to be clear. We're talking. About a grand jury, which is different than a trial jury, but there's similarities as well. But the idea is that. You don't want people embedded in our government. You don't want people who are on the government payroll to be making decisions.

Todd Huff: The basis for these charges is a. 2020 Senate testimony where James Comey. Denied authorizing anyone at the FBI to be an anonymous source. Prosecutors have found or alleged that. This was false and designed to impede.

Todd Huff: The hearing. And so this went to a grand jury. Now let's talk about. A grand jury for a moment because this is important. Congress, the framers, the founders, the people who help build this country were smart enough to understand. That.

Todd Huff: This political abuses could happen in a country. Of course, I would maintain it's probably part of human nature. So whenever someone. Is in political power, they might have an inclination to go after those with whom they disagree because.

Todd Huff: If you can criminalize disagreement or if you can effectively. Turn into criminals. Those who disagree with you. Then the ability to win political fights in your country becomes easier, especially if you can completely outlaw those. That is an atrocious way to behave in a free society. We don't.

Todd Huff: Want this. We don't want every four years or every election cycle there to be a different cast of characters that are targeted by. Our government, by the federal government, by any government. Government. That's a terrible thing. And so that's one of the reasons why one of the many reasons why.

Todd Huff: We have a jury of our peers. In fact. I've seen, and it's comical. I saw one guy do a video where he talked about being on a jury, and he said something like, what do you want me to be? On a jury for man. I'm working 40 hours a week down at the local grocery store or wherever he was. Working. You want me to get into a group of twelve people with a banker?

Todd Huff: With a housewife. With someone. Who's a blue collar worker? Some white collar workers, some retired folks. And you want me? To decide if some random guy is guilty of a crime? No, man. I mean, I don't. Know what I'm doing.

Todd Huff: This is how some people think. Now, I know. I want to be clear. We're talking. About a grand jury, which is different than a trial jury, but there's similarities as well. But the idea is that. You don't want people embedded in our government. You don't want people who are on the government payroll to be making decisions.

Todd Huff: Washed from all. It was supposed to be bleeped out and taken out of transcripts. And so forth. But. The prosecution overlooked an instance, and it was actually in the video. They didn't edit that. Part out. They didn't bleep it out. And so we heard this, the defense attorney immediately objected. They convened a meeting.

Todd Huff: At the judge's bench. The judge said this is going to take some discussion. He dismissed us for an early lunch, a long lunch, and they hashed it out. Turns out we simply were given instructions. The judge did not declare a mistrial. He simply said, look, I'm going to instruct them to not.

Todd Huff: Consider. What they heard in their final decision. But to take in the other facts of the case and we can continue moving forward in this. Particular. Trial. And so the reason is because you want people there who are. It's a type. Of safeguard. It's a type of safeguard that says,

Todd Huff: We want to follow the law. The jury wants to follow the law, but we also want to make sure that the prosecution and that the judge and all the people involved in this have done the right things have provided enough evidence whereby we can say this person is guilty. So it's. A built in safeguard now. That's for.

Todd Huff: A trial. Jury. Now for a grand jury, grand juries are a little bit different. It's a preceding step. And so what happens is. A prosecution prosecutor will convene a grand jury and they will present evidence. These people are regular people.

Todd Huff: It's 23 members on federal grand juries. Are typically. From what I understand are typically is the typical size and this is the same pool of people. That you would have for criminal, or I should say, for trial juries. And so prosecution, the prosecution presents evidence to these members of the grand jury, and they need twelve of the 23 to.

Todd Huff: Vote to what's called a true bill. And if it's a true bill, then. The person is indicted, this will move forward. Into the. Criminal process. They're not deciding the guilt or innocence or guilt or not guilty verdict of the person. They're deciding probable cause. Again, these are all things that are established in determining whether or not a person.

Todd Huff: Is actually. Have at the end of the process guilty. But whether the process simply moves to the next step. And so this grand jury said, by the way, they were given three. Particular charges to consider. One of them, they said that there was not enough evidence to establish probable cause.

Todd Huff: Washed from all. It was supposed to be bleeped out and taken out of transcripts. And so forth. But. The prosecution overlooked an instance, and it was actually in the video. They didn't edit that. Part out. They didn't bleep it out. And so we heard this, the defense attorney immediately objected. They convened a meeting.

Todd Huff: At the judge's bench. The judge said this is going to take some discussion. He dismissed us for an early lunch, a long lunch, and they hashed it out. Turns out we simply were given instructions. The judge did not declare a mistrial. He simply said, look, I'm going to instruct them to not.

Todd Huff: Consider. What they heard in their final decision. But to take in the other facts of the case and we can continue moving forward in this. Particular. Trial. And so the reason is because you want people there who are. It's a type. Of safeguard. It's a type of safeguard that says,

Todd Huff: We want to follow the law. The jury wants to follow the law, but we also want to make sure that the prosecution and that the judge and all the people involved in this have done the right things have provided enough evidence whereby we can say this person is guilty. So it's. A built in safeguard now. That's for.

Todd Huff: A trial. Jury. Now for a grand jury, grand juries are a little bit different. It's a preceding step. And so what happens is. A prosecution prosecutor will convene a grand jury and they will present evidence. These people are regular people.

Todd Huff: It's 23 members on federal grand juries. Are typically. From what I understand are typically is the typical size and this is the same pool of people. That you would have for criminal, or I should say, for trial juries. And so prosecution, the prosecution presents evidence to these members of the grand jury, and they need twelve of the 23 to.

Todd Huff: Vote to what's called a true bill. And if it's a true bill, then. The person is indicted, this will move forward. Into the. Criminal process. They're not deciding the guilt or innocence or guilt or not guilty verdict of the person. They're deciding probable cause. Again, these are all things that are established in determining whether or not a person.

Todd Huff: Is actually. Have at the end of the process guilty. But whether the process simply moves to the next step. And so this grand jury said, by the way, they were given three. Particular charges to consider. One of them, they said that there was not enough evidence to establish probable cause.

Todd Huff: Society. That is not an admirable way to live. That does not help us get to truth. That creates. An air of fear. It silences people who are afraid of getting caught up. In. I guess the political crossfire.

Todd Huff: It silences people. Or it threatens to silence people who simply have different ideas. We don't. Want that, however. On the other side of the equation. You cannot have, you absolutely cannot have a group of people. A group of individuals, or just an individual who thinks he or she can do whatever they want. When they are in political power, because they will then when they're out of political power. Say to you? You can't target me because I'm your political.

Todd Huff: Opposition. You see, context matters. Again. That's why I went through this thing with the grand. Jury. This wasn't just like the Department of Justice came along and said, we're going to arbitrarily charge.

Todd Huff: james comey for what he is alleged to have done in the past nearly five years ago We're going to take this to a grand jury again. That's why these processes exist now. It doesn't. Abused. I would maintain that these things were abused against President Trump. In fact, I want to go through some of the things, how the left has weaponized the government.

Todd Huff: Against Trump. There's a pattern. Of abuse here that we can see. And here's the question we have to ask ourselves. Yes, on the so many things are like riding a bicycle, right? You have to find balance between.

Todd Huff: The two and you'll hear when the left is on one side of the argument. In this particular case. They are on the side that says we don't want basically comey to face justice. We want to protect Tomi. All you hear about is how dangerous it is for the government. To seek to get retribution.

Todd Huff: Against its political enemies. By the way, I agree with that. That's a terrible thing. If the government is seeking retribution. But there's another side of this. You can tip the bicycle over to the left.

Todd Huff: As Biden did when he was riding his ten speed or whatever he was riding when he was president and he tipped over stationary. But you can tip it over both directions. You got to. Balance it both left and right. You can balance or tip over. I should say the other direction. If you're not properly balanced and the other direction is when.

Todd Huff: We refuse to hold people to account. When we refuse to enforce the law, when we refuse to go after people who have been actively weaponizing the government to go after. Their political opposition, their adversaries in prior years. That is the other side of this. And that is why context is king. That is why nuance and context matters. That is why it matters to understand the facts of the situation. James Comey should not be exempt from all political.

Todd Huff: Criminal prosecutions because he is a political adversary of Donald Trump. Likewise, James Comey should not be targeted. For. Criminal trials and so forth, charges, indictments. Simply because he is a political adversary of Trump. These things should not matter.

Todd Huff: But my friends, given where we are in. This. Well. The dismantling of our society and the way that things are supposed to work. This is the place that we have reached, and so this is the place that we are.

Todd Huff: So that's the balance we have to balance between. Keeping making sure we don't target people simply for being on the other side of the. Is. I will not stand for that. Whether it's someone on our side of the aisle being targeted or someone on the other. Side. I am, however, a fan of justice, and I don't want to see people use that as a defense that says just because I'm on the other side of the aisle. Politically from you, I should be able to do whatever I want.

Todd Huff: Whenever I want to do it and keep you from holding me accountable, per the law. Once you are in political power, the other side that is equally as bad. Justice needs to be pursued, and that's what I want to talk about here. So in the next segment, we're going to talk about some of the ways the left has weaponized. Government, you'll see a pattern of abuse. Many of these things you know, some of these things might jar some things back in the memory, but you get the idea. But I've. Got to take a time out. In the meantime, my friends, sit tight. You are listening here? To the home of conservative.

Todd Huff: Not bitter talk. I'm your host, Todd huff. Back in just a minute. Welcome back, my friends. Talking about James Comey's indictments here today. Before I get too much further down that path. Let me remind you here that well, of those folks that you've seen out there. You've noticed some families, they have a plan.

(Sponsor: Full Sweet Wealth — https://fullsweetwealth.com)

Todd Huff: To deal with anything that lasts for generations. That's not by accident, my friends. Full, sweet. Wealth works with people who want. To make sure that their wealth will make a difference for years to come, for generations to come. Their team brings together high level investment strategies like private equity, private credit and option strategies.

Todd Huff: With expert legal guidance. It's all about making sure your vision becomes a reality for the people you love today. And tomorrow, if you're looking to do more than just manage your money, If you want to leave a mark and build something lasting, take a look at full, sweet wealth. Full suitewealth.com is the website. Jason and his team will take great care of you very skilled and have a wide variety of ways that they can help you as you look to build your legacy and secure your future with full.

Todd Huff: Sweet wealth if you go there. By the way, if you reach out to them, let them know. You heard about them here on the Tata show. By the way, I want to say this, too. I want to say this too. We here at the Tide Huff show?

Todd Huff: We do our level best. To find. Businesses, partners, sponsors. That you can benefit from. From every sponsor, but we try to find people that we think can provide you with a product. A service, some value, some things that we think you would be interested in knowing about, and so. Those are the folks that make this program possible.

Todd Huff: If you can support those advertisers, those sponsors, those partners, I encourage you to do. So full sweet wealth is just one of them. In fact, we're coming to you from the full sweet wealth studios that you would have heard and mentioned at the top of the program.

Todd Huff: If you heard it from the beginning. Anyway, my friends. So let's get back to this. Let's get back to talking about Comey here. Let's get back to talking about these indictments, and there's really questions here. Right should political elites, should, people on the left, either side of the aisle. But in this case,

Todd Huff: I know Comey, they say, is a Republican. Comey's is anti Trump as they get Comey is someone who is interested in the uni party. I don't know. That comey is a leftist, but he's a lover of big government. There's no doubt about that. But should people like comey be able.

Todd Huff: To avoid being held accountable? Or should they be held to the same standard as the average American? As you or I would be held. That's the question. And. Is it revenge? Is it a political retribution to hold someone accountable who actually committed an alleged crime? That's the question here. I mean, that at its core would be no. Right? I mean, the context matters.

Todd Huff: It's not revenge. If. You're basically enforcing the law. It is if you're misapplying the law it is if you're making laws up, as they did against Trump. And prosecuting someone for the first time ever, as they did with Trump, with some sort of a concoction as to how he broke the law. That's not what's. Happening here? This is pretty straightforward. In fact, I can't explain the average conservative. The average? Person can explain to you what Comey is alleged to have done wrong here much more easily. Than the average.

Todd Huff: Person can explain what Trump did wrong. In some of his legal. Shenanigans that he's had to deal with. All right. But before the break, I'd mentioned that the left. Has weaponized the government for some time. You'll see that there's a pattern.

Todd Huff: A pattern of abuse. As Michael Scott would say during the depth. That's one of my favorite offices, the deposition. There's a pattern. He has to have mnemonic devices to remember words that he wants to say. Pat took a turn. He said, don't ask me how. That medium, remember? It. But there's a pattern of abuse here. Pat, turn of abuse. Let's go. Through some of these. Some of these go back 15 years or so. In fact, this first one does IRS targeting 2010.

Todd Huff: To 2013. The Tea party groups. Remember tea party groups? They were flagged for extra security. This is lois lerner, irs admitted wrongdoing. In a 2017 settlement, tea Party groups, conservative groups, were targeted, were flagged for extra scrutiny. I might have said security scrutiny is what I meant to say.

Todd Huff: And this was admitted finally in 2000. And 17. They were targeted because they were conservative. Crossfire, hurricane. Now we're getting into the Trump era 2016. That's when the FBI used Clinton funded steel dossier. Oh, yes. The steel dossier. Russia, Russia, Russia. Collusion, delusion. They use this for FIsa warrants. On Trump.

Todd Huff: Aid. Carter page. The inspector general found 17 errors and or admissions. Omissions from this, so they use this dossier to effectively spy. Trump said to phone tap his administrative, his campaign, I should say.

Todd Huff: Good old Clinton emails. Hillary Clinton's emails back prior to the 2016 election. James Comey at the time, FBI Director James Comey admitted. Remember this? I remember talking about this. This program started in 2015, so this wasn't long into this program.

Todd Huff: 's existence. When I had to talk about Clinton email servers, that's when I told you that Hillary Clinton thought that it was safe to house a server in her bathroom. She thought that the four walls and the door that locked around that server acted as a firewall.

Todd Huff: And all the crazy things that came from that, but Hillary. Comey said of Hillary that she acted extremely careless. But. The Department of Justice said they weren't going to press charges. You remember this came out. Just a few weeks before the election.

Todd Huff: It was all kind of a mess back then, but Comey came out and says she acted. Extremely carelessly, but that. She. That didn't warrant. Charges to be. Filed. There's a term. I'm drawing a blank on the term.

Todd Huff: It'll come to me in a moment. But basically. That was what. Comey concluded, siding with Hillary and actually doing something that hadn't been done, which is go to the podium and explain why. Charges were not brought against somebody.

Todd Huff: Then, of course, we had the rushing collusion probe. This consumed Trump's. Well, you could. Say his entire presidency, but definitely the first couple of years. Mueller later found that there was no conspiracy. That entire thing. I never, from day one,

Todd Huff: Understood why somebody. Would have ever believed that story that Trump got on an airplane and went to the Kremlin. I mean, this is how I envision it anyway. But whether the specifics are what they allege.

Todd Huff: This is generally what the argument was, that Trump called up or visited with Putin and had him get some of his best social media. Marketers to effectively convince or to trick Hillary voters on social media platforms like Twitter. At the time, like Pokemon go to trick them into believing.

Todd Huff: That they should vote for Trump instead of Hillary. It's just preposterous. This whole thing was just idiotic. As I said before, if a marketing firm was that effective at getting results. They would be hired by people all over. They could charge whatever price they wanted, and by the way, the last step of any conspiracy is not.

Todd Huff: A media campaign. It's not an advertising blitz. But anyway, that's out there as well. Where they use this to weaponize against the Trump administration. What about Hunter Biden's laptop. Remember when there were 51? Not just one or two or five, but.

Todd Huff: 51 so called. Intelligence experts, intelligence officials in the weeks leading up to the 2020 election. You see a pattern here? You see a pattern where. There's evidence of wrongdoing. By a candidate, in the case of Hillary or by the candidate's son, that could potentially implicate the candidate himself, Joe Biden in 2020. You see this and then you have people step in at the last minute.

Todd Huff: From within the government or those who have government credentials who assure the rest of us that Hillary didn't do anything wrong. And that Hunter Biden didn't do anything wrong. In fact, the 51 intelligence experts told us that it was most likely russian disinformation, misinformation.

Todd Huff: And the FBI warned tech companies before the election. And this is where. This information was throttled. It was kept from being shared across these platforms. And a lot of people, even in the wake of the election, came out and said,

Todd Huff: That had they known this, they would have not voted for Joseph Robin it bribery. I remember I remember telling you behind this microphone. In 2020 or maybe 2012. It was 2020, because before the election, I remember saying this little old guy with a microphone.

Todd Huff: Talk radio show podcast. Knows more, apparently, than 51 intelligence professionals, the so called experts. By the way, if you ever want to know why people like me are skeptical of trusting the experts.

Todd Huff: Look no further than this because. This is a bunch of bunk. They made it up. They had no reason to say what they were saying. It turns out the hunter Biden laptop story was absolutely true. And here we are. Here we are now dealing with some of the repercussions of this and again, part of those repercussions.

Todd Huff: And excusing me, by the way. I've got a bit of a sinus infection. This happens to me every fall. I'm trying every trick I can to prevent this. So you might hear some coughing or the voice changing. Anyway.

Todd Huff: The Hunter Biden laptop story is another. Example, I'm up against the clock gear, my friends. I'm out of time. This segment. Sit tight. We'll continue on the other side of the break. You're listening? To conservative, not better talk. I'm your host, Todd huff. Back in just a minute.

Todd Huff: Welcome back, my friends. Third and final segment of this, the Todd Huff show. It's good. To be back here on this Monday. Friends, I want to tell you really quickly too, if you're concerned about cholesterol. If you're concerned about heart health.

(Sponsor: Soltea — https://soltea.com — promo code TODD)

Todd Huff: Consider taking salty? Salty isn't all natural. Clinically proven way to lower your cholesterol. It's been proven to be good. For your heart. And it's something that, again, science has spoken on here. Science has spoken on and told us that.

Todd Huff: Salty is safe and it is effective. It's all natural. It's not a drug. You don't have to go to your doctor again. I'm not against the doctor. I'm against the Doctor every time there's a sniffle, but there's. A time to go to the doctor.

Todd Huff: This is a good first step. It's very affordable. Salty.com is the website I take the product, you can as well. Salty.com Sol to Eap promo code Todd gets you what, free shipping and 50% off. That's a heck of a deal, my friends. 50% off your first purchase as I said it's already quite affordable.

Todd Huff: The discount makes it even more so salty. S o l t e. A promo code. Todd. All right, I got a little to catch up on here before we get to the end. Of the program. Today. One thing I didn't mention before in the last segment, because of time constraints, big tech censorship back from 2020.

Todd Huff: To 2022. The White House pressured, we know this now, the Biden administration, President Bribery and his autopin, and people on his staff pressured Facebook and Twitter to suppress what they consider to be misinformation. Just let this sink in. You want to talk about a real violation? Against the first amendment, against your rights to.

Todd Huff: Speak your mind. In a public form, like Facebook or Twitter or whatever. X. Whatever it was called back then. This is it. This isn't. This isn't Biden just complaining about some of the things said about him on Facebook. This isn't like Trump saying the media is fake. News.

Todd Huff: This is actually using. The powers and the force of the government. To tell a private company. To silence people, to silence certain opinions that they don't politically agree with. This is at the heart.

Todd Huff: Of the sort of things that the founders wanted to prevent. When they pinned. The First Amendment. Missouri versus Biden court case flagged potential First Amendment violations. I mean, this is right there for anyone to see. So this is how conservatives, or in particular.

Todd Huff: How Trump have been targeted. By. Well by the government. This is how they've been targeted. By. The weaponization of our government. Now we don't want to do the same. I know. That there are people out there who say, Todd, if they do it, then we should do it. As well. I reject that position. I do. I reject that position. I understand the thinking.

Todd Huff: Todd if we always play by the rules, and they never play by the rules. We're going to have a problem, my friends, if we all decide we're not. Going to play by the rules, then we're all definitely going to have a problem. We have to fix this problem the right way. We have to be willing to do whatever it takes.

Todd Huff: Whatever it takes legally. Whatever it takes morally, as long as it falls within. Those lines. It's moral and legal, then we have to be prepared to do that in fact, on today's tide talk, I talked about that very thing. I talked about this concept. Of redistricting.

Todd Huff: For those who are resistant to redistricting. In fact, I might make a phone call here. In my state, I'm not sure. I've been thinking about it, but. I might be calling my representative to tell her that I think we should look into.

Todd Huff: Pursuing the redistricting model. I know that. Upsets some people, even people on the conservative side, and I understand. But I also understand that we're in the midst of a cold civil war, and I also understand.

Todd Huff: That blue states have already squeezed as much. Political opportunity as they can from their states, the way that they have districted those states and now they're telling us no one else can do the same. I reject that. I fully. Understand. Blue states can do it. We know Missouri, Texas have both.

Todd Huff: Signed into law their new maps. California is proceeding with a map to basically try to counteract what's happened in those two states, but Indiana is a state that could potentially do that. As well. There's plenty of others. And there's a lot more.

Todd Huff: Territory for Republicans to gain some seats, for Republicans to potential to gain. There's no guarantee in this. There's no guarantee in this at all. This is a political exercise. There can be political consequences for doing these things. I'm just saying we have to be prepared and willing to do whatever is moral, legal and ethical. In order to win this fight, there has to be a winner. You can't comprom.

Todd Huff: Compromise. You can't compromise, my friends, with the people who are cheering for the death of Charlie Kirk that are mocking his death. There's no compromise for those. There are compromises. That can be made with other people on the left side of the aisle, the liberals and the Democrats.

Todd Huff: You cannot compromise. With that level of moral depravity that are cheering for the death of people that are in our group. Selected. Prosecution was had with BLM riders in 2020. Many charges were dropped quickly.

Todd Huff: Conversed. Or I guess, compare and contrast that with the way that January sixers were prosecuted. Aggressively, by the way. Some should have been, but many were held. In violation were denied due process. Where's the concern about that?

Todd Huff: It's just not there. My friend's context matters, and it matters a lot. It's wrong to target. Our opponents just because there are opponents. But it's also wrong to shield those who are. The elites. Those who are.

Todd Huff: In the inner circle. Excuse me? The voices acted up here. Those who. Are responsible for doing some of these things. Those who are responsible, potentially, for weaponizing the government. Misleading the public, doing all sorts of things, and then suddenly.

Todd Huff: Saying they can't be held accountable because they're on the other side of the political aisle. It's wrong to do that as well. True rule of law. It cuts both ways, my friends, even for those who are powerful and connected. I have to go. Have a wonderful day. We'll talk again soon, my friends. SDG.

Todd Huff

Todd Huff is a popular talk show host and podcaster known for his intelligent and entertaining conservative discussions on The Todd Huff Show, which attracts 200,000 weekly listeners. He covers a variety of topics, including politics and culture, with a focus on authentic and meaningful dialogue. Outside of work, he enjoys traveling with his family, spending time outdoors, and coaching his kids' soccer team.

Next

The Stack: Condemning Political Violence and Honoring Charlie Kirk’s Legacy