The Stack: Epstein Files Firestorm and Political Theater in Congress
Fireworks erupted in Washington as Attorney General Pam Bondi testified before Congress amid renewed controversy over the Epstein Files. Democrats staged dramatic confrontations, including calls for public apologies to victims, while Republicans pushed back against what they viewed as political spectacle.
But beyond the viral clips and soundbites lies a serious constitutional question: What does justice actually require? Todd examines the tension between transparency and due process, the legal thresholds for prosecution, and the dangers of turning oversight hearings into campaign theater—especially in a midterm election year.
Are lawmakers genuinely seeking accountability for victims, or leveraging outrage for political advantage? Todd argues that justice must be rooted in evidence, not anger—and that both parties have incentives that complicate the truth.
In a moment defined by suspicion, redactions, and partisan drama, Americans deserve clarity—not chaos.
🎧 Listen to Today’s Episode
📰 Stack Links
Pam Bondi faces grilling over Epstein files at House hearing
Bondi clashes with lawmakers over Epstein files in tense House hearing
Pam Bondi rejects call to apologize to Epstein victims at House hearing
Lawmakers accuse DOJ of tracking searches in Epstein files review
Attorney General Bondi Is Not Finished Reminding Americans What Dems Are Trying to Distract From
House Judiciary hearing erupts over DOJ handling of Epstein documents
Epstein Files Transparency Act passes unanimously in Congress
Ghislaine Maxwell sentenced to 20 years in sex trafficking case
Justice Department releases additional Epstein-related documents
🛒 Shop The Official Todd Huff Show Store
Let your lapel do the talking. This 5-button pack features fan-favorite Todd Huff Show slogans and artwork — scratch-resistant, UV-protected, and ready to spark conversations.
Perfect for backpacks, jackets, or gifting to your fellow common-sense conservatives. Wear your values. Start a conversation.
📝 Transcript: Epstein Files Firestorm and Political Theater in Congress
The Todd Huff Show – February 13, 2026
Todd Huff: Yesterday, my friends, there were Fireworks in Washington, D.C. as we have come to expect. We're in the mist, as I've said many, many times for a long, long time. We're in the midst of a cold civil war. It is. I mean, the emotions are cranked all the way up. We've got. We've got a lot of things that we're fighting about. Plus there's a government shutdown. A partial government shutdown. It looks like the Department of Homeland Security, which. Listen, I'm not a fan of all these departments and everything, but there are legitimate responsibilities our government has in protecting the homeland. Whether there's an actual Department of Homeland Security or not, but the things that are happening within that. Within that department protecting the homeland. Are legitimate. Sometimes we're doing maybe things we shouldn't be doing and so forth as it pertains to certain things. But there's a lot of things that are happening in there that are absolutely the job of the government, and those apparently are going to be stopped here for at least a period of time. With the temporary government shutdown, which will begin tonight, depending upon when you're listening to my lovely voice here tonight. Friday night, the 13th, 11:59pm that looks to be where we're headed.
Todd Huff: When the clock strikes midnight. Yes, my friends, we know what happens. There will be a government shutdown unless something. Which, again, is not going to happen because the Senate and the House are both not even. Not even going to be there anyway. This is where we're headed. But there's fireworks of another variety that happened yesterday when Pam Bondi, attorney general here in the US Was called the Testify. And again. There was just a lot that I want to unpack and discuss here today. As it pertains to the Epstein files, the Department of Justice oversight from Congress over matters like this. That's what I want to talk about here today, my friends. Thank you for tuning in, friends. Are you tired, though, of spending your hard earned money at businesses that take that money, turn around and support leftist causes? Well, You're not alone, for starters. And that's exactly why we created Freedom Marketplace.
Todd Huff (Sponsor): Freedom Marketplace is a free. It's totally free to you. It's a searchable directory of businesses that share your values. These are businesses that are pushing in the right. Well, the right direction and the same direction. As you, and they vowed not to support leftist candidates or leftist causes. There's no login required, no strings attached. You can create an account, but you don't have to. You can go and look at the directory and find businesses that are good, patriotic businesses that are again pushing in the same direction you were pushing. Check it out today. Freedom marketplace.net that's the. The place where you can go to find a listing directory of listings there, freedom marketplace.net liberty and business for all.
Todd Huff: Okay, let's talk about the Jeffrey. Epstein controversy. The. There's. There's theories, there's conspiracy theories, there's all sorts of things surrounding this. This is an emotionally charged thing, and for good reason. For good reason. And I want to start by asking you. What do you think reasonable people want? What is the reasonable expectation and outcome? Of what has happened here. You know we want. Justice. But people in Congress know this, and they create spectacle to make it look like they're trying to pursue justice. But what they're trying to pursue is politics. I don't think. Listen, I don't want my side. Doing that, and we'll talk about that a little.
Todd Huff: I think we want evidence. I think we want people who have enough evidence against them to face the consequences of that, which would be a trial. They need to be presumed innocent and so forth. We don't just want people locked away. I don't think. For suspicion. I remember again, I was on a jury. I've shared this on here. You know this? I've told stories about this. It was. A pretty, pretty impactful thing for me to be a part of. There was a jury that I was on back eight years ago now, I believe. And it involved the death of. Of a little boy. It wasn't a murder trial. It was a conspiracy to commit murder trial, and it was. It was horrific. But one of the things the attorneys for the defendant said at the very beginning was that. He basically acknowledged, because he knew when it got time for evidence to be introduced to the jury, that we were going to see things. That painted his client in an absolutely horrible light.
Todd Huff: And during the questioning process, right? Both the prosecutor and the defendant are able to. Dismiss jurors that they think won't be. Beneficial to the outcome that they're seeking and so forth. But even during that process, the questions that the defendant, the defense attorney, I guess, was. Was asking, were questions to decide if we, the people on the jury, could be fair. You know what happens if you understand that the person on trial, this was the sort of questions that he. He was asking. Our juror pool. What happens if you find out that the charges that the man you are going to be hearing his case? If those involve children and some people. The guy next to me literally said, if someone is alleged to have harmed a child, I think they're guilty. No matter what.
Todd Huff: These aren't the things that people make up. Now, was he just saying that to get off the jury? Was he? Is that really what he believes? I don't know. But that's not good either, right? I mean, you. You want to be impartial. You want to say, listen, these things, these charges are terrible. Let's take a deep breath and let's actually spend our time not being angry. And just looking for someone to blame. Let's make sure that this person is the one who needs to be held accountable. And some people can't do that. So we want evidence. We don't want just suspicion. We definitely don't want the equivalent of modern day witch trials and so forth. Then you've got the fact, and I alluded to this off the top. You've got oversight from Congress versus political theater. Congress absolutely has oversight, and they can ask questions. They can request that the Department of Justice or other representatives of the executive branch come in and give an accounting of some of the things that are going on. And this is fair game.
Todd Huff: But political theater is. Is unfortunately the name of the game. In fact, if you watched any of that, Of that spectacle yesterday. You will know exactly what I'm talking about. It. At one point in the process, Representative Jayapal from Washington State, there were victims. Epstein victims were in that hearing room, and those are small rooms. When I was in D.C. i went to a couple of hearings, I guess. And they were in the room. And Representative J. Paul asked Pam, Bonnie, turn around, she says, Look at the victims behind you and apologize to them. Now, listen, this is not how legitimate oversight is done. This was done to elicit a reaction. Pam Bondi refused to turn around. Of course. There's pictures of this, and they're saying, look how heartless she is. But this is. This is political theater. This is manipulation. This is the intention of going out to try to score political points. And we. That's not what we want. Either side. Either side of this.
Todd Huff: And then, of course, we want transparency. Without violating the due process rights of others when it comes to releasing these files. Which. What does that even mean? I don't. I don't know. You know, I don't know what is going on here. There's a lot of questions. And you get things that are released and then they're heavily redacted. The law that Congress passed last year, I think it was basically called for these to be as transparent as possible. But the problem is there are other laws on the books. I mean, friends, this. You know, when a new law is passed, it doesn't just supersede anything else that's out there. Right. This is part of the reason we have courts to go back and interpret these things and say, look. I don't know how to. You know, sometimes the courts will say this Congress needs to address this because this is irreconcilable.
Todd Huff: This law is saying that, that this needs to be basically not redacted at all. But then there's another law that says if you're releasing these, you have to respect. You know, certain information and privacy and victims and even people who are. Potentially alleged. I mean, there might be reason. There might be a lot of reasons. A lot of laws and red tape. We want transparency. We don't want to. Simply because the crimes are heinous. To throw that aside, which, again, is an interesting thing to talk about right now. Because people are claiming that those who are deported civilly here in this country are having their due process rights taken away. They are not. It's a different process when you're not being charged criminally. That's the reason that they do it. It's administer if it's a civil. If they choose to enforce it civilly. It's not the same process. It's not the same burden of proof.
Todd Huff: You don't get a trial by jury trial and those sorts of things. If, if it's a. If it's a civil charge and you're not here, if you're not here legally and you can't prove it, the process is simply deportation. You have people crying that that that's somehow a violation of people's rights, when in reality it isn't. And then you've got people who want to see the alleged people here. Who committed these heinous acts. Of course I want justice, but I don't want to throw out the legal process, whatever it is, even the part of the process I think the stupid, which maybe there are some, I don't think constitutionally stupid. I mean, Some of the things that have happened. Over the course of time with legislation, maybe there's again conflicting or irreconcilable sorts of situations where one law says to release this, the other says you can't. What do you do? Right? And it's. It's. It's just a mess.
Todd Huff: So we want justice. We want there to be evidence. We want people to be held accountable. We want there to be oversight, even if our parties the one being overseen. That's the way that this works, and it has to work that way. And we want transparency and we want due process, but justice for the victims. To me is is paramount. And we want real accountability for anyone who knowingly participated in the. Evil and wicked things that were being done. Allegedly by jeffrey epstein. Ghislaine maxwell. And again. There's other people who are that they facilitated to engage in these illegal, evil, wicked acts, and we want accountability for those folks. For everyone. We want justice for the victims, transparency. Without destroying innocent people. And a clear explanation of what exists and what does not.
Todd Huff: And that's part of this as well. I know about a year ago, Pam Bondi had mentioned all this evidence they had that's sitting there on her desk, and there's. It's just not been smooth since that point in time. It hasn't been. And of course, that raises lots of questions. Why wasn't it smooth? Are they trying to protect somebody? Is there a legal reason? Is there something else going on here? You know, when we talked about the Epstein files or heard about the Epstein files, which we've heard about them for years, I think some people expected or had envisioned in their mind almost. You know, if it's a physical paper trail or a digital paper trail, there's folders with names of people. And then evidence. Pictures, videos, text message. Well, text messages, emails. Whatever that implicates each person. Some people thought that maybe Jeffrey Epstein had almost like a customer log. This person came in. They? He paid me and he got. You know, this is what happened. These are the names of the victims.
Todd Huff: I don't. Know that. That we've not seen bats. If it does exist. I don't know that it does. Exist, but that's what a lot of people had in mind. And so when that's not forthcoming or that's not being presented to the public, Then there's lots of questions about this, and I understand, understandably, so they need to answer these questions. What do they have? That, you know, they act as though they've released virtually everything. I guess. I don't know. But do they have more? Information, more evidence. Are there laws on the books that prevent them? From being released. How heavily redacted do these things have to be? Are they opening themselves up to a lawsuit? If there is a. If they release something and they don't have the evidence to charge somebody. What happens there? I don't. I don't know the answers to these questions. But it would be nice to have a clear explanation.
Todd Huff: And you can't have that when one side. Listen, you can make the case that Pam Bondi is trying to. You know, sweep whatever's left of this under the rug and just obstruct and all that. You can make the case? Certainly. You can also make the case. That the other side is trying to make a spectacle out of this. By the way, where were they? Where were they just a little over a year ago when their guy was in office? And there wasn't even a peep about this stuff. This stuff? The. The Epstein files have been. There have been. I mean. In the record for a long time in our government's control, whatever they were. Why wasn't there pressure then? Why does it only matter now? And you don't have to have much insight and wisdom to realize the reason for that is that they didn't want to hold the other administration accountable. They wanted to make a political spectacle over this.
Todd Huff: It. It's not real, the outrage that these leftist politicians have. I mean, most of them. I can't speak. Person by person, but it's less to me in my estimation. About the things I talked about off the top. It's less about justice to them. And it's more about political opportunity. It's more about imposing damage upon your political opponent. And that's the sad state of affairs that we're in. In this country today, when something like this happens, the first question is, well, how can I use that? To benefit my message, my name, my party, my fundraising efforts. And how can I use that? To harm my political opposition. How can I do that? And when. That is the lens through which they view the world. What we have is what we saw yesterday. In Washington, D.C.
Todd Huff: I might play a couple of the sound bites. I mean, it's. It's just absolutely. Every institution has been corrupted again. Not by the way that it was set up by our founders. But by people who don't have any business being there, by people who don't have enough integrity and character to do the right thing about not, not enough people who seek the things that we talked about here off the top instead of personal and political gain. But that's what happens. Epstein clearly committed crimes. Lane Maxwell has been convicted. There's been large amounts of documents that have been released. Emails, communications between Epstein and some high profile individuals. There's not been a new wave of any prosecutions. And maybe there's not enough evidence. I mean, listen, I don't like to say that. Because again, I seek justice. I seek justice for the victims. But is there enough. Is there enough to actually prosecute and get convictions?
Todd Huff: I don't know. And the thing is, I'm skeptical of every. I'm skeptical of. Of everybody because of. Because of the political ramifications, especially now. That we're in a midterm election year, and that's what the left loves, that. And so let's make a spectacle of this. And, you know, it's. It's so ironic to me. I don't. I don't agree with these people politically. But if they were being fair, And asking questions and trying to get to answers. And not just trying in some cases. There was Jerry Nadler, who's going to be retiring from Congress, from the People's Republic. Of California, who also, by the way, dozed off during his colleague Jamie Raskin's, I think, opening remarks. In the hearing. But Jerry Nadler would you get five minutes? And this is something else. I don't know if the app you understand. I bet the average person, I don't know if they understand. Every person gets five minutes.
Todd Huff: So if your person, they're like Pam Bondi, somebody gets five minutes to question you, and you get to respond, but it's got to be within that five minute window. And so there's a game being played with that. In fact, Jerry Nadler would spend about four minutes, it was said. I didn't watch all of this. But it's been reported that Jerry Nadler was using four of his five minutes to basically launch into a tirade and then not give Pam Bondi a chance to respond. Then you get to the end of the period of time and it goes to the next. Usually it goes from Republican to Democrat and vice versa. So you don't ever really get a chance. Sometimes the person whose time is next will allow you to respond to the questions. But this is all a game. It's all designed and it's sad. It's all designed for political to get a desired political outcome when what we should be trying to get is desired justice. Whatever that is. Whatever that is.
Todd Huff: So we have all these things and there's a lot of suspicious stuff. Some really. Maybe some damning stuff, but is suspicious enough. To bring criminal charges. By the way, being in contact with Jeffrey Epstein is not proof of knowledge of trafficking, is not proof that another person and this would involve people from again, Both sides, whether the name Bill Clinton, Donald Trump or anybody else. Just because they knew Epstein, they had a picture with him. Just because they went to fundraising dinners with him. They may not have known any of this. They may have been in the center of all of this. We have no way of knowing what that evidence. Does it exist? Is it being withheld? Has it been redacted? What is going. What's going on? So more on this, my friends. I don't have the answer. This is. This is aggravating to me. It puts someone like me to come on here and talk about. I have to talk about this stuff. But what do I say about it? Because nobody really knows the truth.
Todd Huff: And it's a spectacle. On one side, there's the realities of what we actually have, what exists on the other. And then there's a desire to protect yourself. If you're paying body and. And it's hard to candidly go through this objectively. It's easy to come on here and rant on one side of the other, but I'm just being. I'm being transparent with you on this because I just. It's. It's. It's mind boggling to me. Mind boggling to me. Friends. Maybe you've reached that stage. Where managing your money feels more like juggling more. Than just numbers. You've got tax planning, estate work, investment choices, a whole lot more. That's when family office services can really make a difference. Full suite. Wealth brings all those pieces together into one cohesive strategy.
Todd Huff (Sponsor): Their family office services gives you access to a coordinated team with advanced option strategies, private equity, private credit and legal expertise. All those things. Under one roof. It's about simplifying. Simplifying your financial life, planning for the future, and making sure your legacy, your legacy stays strong for generations. If you're ready for the next level of support, head over to FullSuite Wealth.com that's Full Sweet Wealth.com Build your legacy. Secure your future. Timeout, my friends. Back in a minute. Welcome back, my friends. I realize. I realize some people can say, todd, that's naive. This is just the way the world works. And maybe you're right, actually. I know that's the way the world works. But demanding that we try to maintain a society that follows the law, that holds our politicians accountable, that seeks justice for victims. I understand that what I'm fighting against is often, well, is candidly rooted.
Todd Huff: Candidly rooted in pure evil. I understand. All those things. But it doesn't mean that we see trying to achieve it. If we do, what do we have left that's worth fighting for? My friends. Many people assume that these again files mint organized case files. And that implicated powerful individuals. Lots of powerful people. And that these things were ready to be indictments. And that's simply not what we have. Maybe that exists somewhere. We haven't seen something quite like that. We don't know what remains sealed or unseen, what remains redacted. We don't know what was investigated and closed. Are there other files that are separately held? Anything is possible. And even your answer to that. If you say yeah, there's other files in other places that aren't in this batch. You can say, okay, the cynic would say that's intentional trying to protect people, and that's absolutely a legitimate possibility.
Todd Huff: Another person would say, well, it wasn't intentional. These people are just inept. And just like in the days leading up to 9 11. The CIA and the FBI had no idea what each other knew. That was part of the reason some of these terrorists that ended up hijacking planes and crashing them into buildings and the Pentagon. And out in Shanksville, Penn knows first. Into the ground. Those people may have potentially been identified if the government was better at being agile and good at communicating between departments and things like that between agencies. So I don't know. I don't know any of these things. None of us do. We don't know what legal thresholds have been. Have been met. We don't know if there's other things out there. We don't know if what we're being told is a carefully orchestrated narrative designed to protect powerful people. If it's just simply the reality of what was in there. It may be damning, but it's not potentially enough to indict and try to seek a conviction. I don't know. I don't know.
Todd Huff: But do we want prosecutions simply based on anger? Do we want prosecutions based on evidence? I know. A lot of times it makes us maybe feel good again. I want justice. I want justice for these victims. But what happens if they charge a case simply because of pressure, but there's not enough evidence, the case gets dropped. They lose the case. What happens then? And then the other side of the coin can be the same thing. What happens if they never charge anyone? We know what we have there because that's where this anger comes from. We've got victims. We've got people who are already. Well, Jeffrey Epstein, of course, is dead. Although that's something that's in the Epstein files, too. Someone shared that with me the other day. Someone who's apparently in there saying that he was in jail and saw Jeffrey Epstein walk out. Listen. I'm not even getting. I don't even know.
Todd Huff: My point is this. Is all over the place. This is all over the place. There is a lot of tension. And I don't know that we're ever going to get what we desire. I don't. And listen, I'm an optimistic guy. I love this country. I know that. I understand what human nature is what it is. And that the government is inept. Too, so I don't know where this ends. I don't know that anybody's ever. As much as I don't like to say this, I don't know that anybody's ever going to pay for what was happened. To these young girls, these victims. What I do know is this. I do know that the Democrats in Congress, the drama Kratz want to put on a spectacle. I do know that they won a political show. And I know that in general that the Republicans want this to go away. Now that. They're in political power.
Todd Huff: But again. I'm going to be consistently fair here. That's one thing we have learned to not count on from many people in Congress. Very much. People on the left in Congress. Because, again, they didn't care about this until, metaphorically, five minutes ago, when they realized that they had a political winner to blame Trump to make all these allegations that Trump's in here. And the Epstein files, and not just in there by association. They never even take the time to explain that as I did. They don't want you to have any nuance or context. They just want you to hear Trump's in the files because they know what mental image that creates. They know that that makes you think he's guilty of one of these crimes. And there's no evidence of that. There's no evidence of that. Yes, there's communications with him in the file, like there is with a lot of people.
Todd Huff: But there's no evidence that anything happened with Trump. In fact, there's actually evidence Trump kicked him out of Epstein, out of Mar? A Lago, and so forth. There's evidence that Trump didn't want anything to do. With Epstein. And some of the things that he was aware of, his character and behavior. He may not have known about any of this stuff. We don't know. There's no evidence. But we know that the Democrats want a spectacle. They want to show they desire there to be obstruction in the Department of Justice. When Republicans. Are in office. And by the way, to my Republican friends out there, my conservative friends out there, When the shoe is on the other foot and Democrats are in Congress. We should be fair. To them as well. This isn't just a one way street here saying be fair to us when we're in office. But when you're in office, we're going to carry on in the same nonsensical ways. You won't get that for me.
Todd Huff: I'm sure there's other people out there. That talk about politics. Who will behave like that, if that's your thing. If you don't care about truth and justice and just want the, you know, the firebrand stuff that leads you nowhere but anger and never having any answers, then people can consume that if they want. That's not what we do here. I'm trying to make sense of this. And I don't have the answers. I am fumbling through this with you. I don't know. Democrats want the show. They want to show obstruction. They want to make the Department of Justice, the Trump administration, look bad. Republicans want to avoid damage from the narrative. Both sides are going to want sound bites and clips. And so it creates this incentive. Especially for the people who are on the opposition. For factoring social media and what happens online and so forth. This viral confrontation, that opportunity that exists.
Todd Huff: And so that's kind of what happened. I mentioned earlier that. Representative J apal asked Pam Bondi to turn around and to apologize to the victims of Epstein, who had made their way into the hearing yesterday. Again. We went through that. They have the right to be there. But creating a public confrontation in a hearing is not focused on justice. That's focused on optics. That's focused on putting the person that you're questioning in a real. Pickle. So again, the way that you use your time when you're given the opportunity to ask questions. You can choose to make it into a spectacle. Or you can choose to pursue truth. The pursuit of truth is much less sensational. It's much more boring to people out there. In the low information crowd that just want to be entertained by the next social media clip. So they choose the other. Many of these choose the other. And so. There you have it. That's where we are.
Todd Huff: This. In a way, feels a bit endless. We've got Epstein, who is dead. We've got conspiracy narratives that fill the vacuum. I'm not dismissing every one of them. I'm just saying that's what's there. Public assumes that the elites are being protected. Totally legitimate explanation, possibly. Government communicates poorly. They don't know how to manage anything. There's rules and red tape and bureaucracy. All this, it's like a perfect storm. And every delay further deepens our suspicions. Every crazy little thing that happens makes this more of a head scratcher to the average person. So, friends, if you're curious about Kratom, If you've heard the bad things about it, you read the headlines. You want to know more about it, head on over to Christopher's Organic botanicals dot com. They're a family run company. They partner with farmers in Indonesia. To get the Kratom, and it's tested for safety and purity. There's no chemicals, no fillers, no shortcuts. This isn't the synthetic junk that other people are out there selling. It's a trusted herbal option that's been used for generations.
Todd Huff (Sponsor): And it is a real alternative for people looking for something that doesn't come with a warning label. That is as long as the CVS receipt. So you can research there, you can research elsewhere. When you're ready to make a purchase, start with the Kratom Starter pack coupon code Toddhuff saves you 10% on your first order. Christopher's Organic Botanicals.com that's Christopher's Organic Botanicals.Com Truth. Tradition, transparency. And, yes. Timeout for me, my friends. Back in just a minute. Final segment here of the week. My friends, I'm going to just play you a couple of things here. To give you a flavor. Of this hearing. These clips. By the way, you'll find. In our daily truth. Daily truth. Summary of the program, which goes out by email. There's more. Links to articles. Here we dig a little bit deeper, get into things sometimes that I can't talk about on the show for time purposes. You can sign up for that at toddheveshow. Com. It's totally free. And I hope that you do that.
Todd Huff: We're doing more stuff with the inner circle. My friend. Okay? Yeah, we'll get to that in a moment, my friends. One more thing. One more bit of little reminder here before I get as much get back to as much of this as I can in the time. We have remaining. There's a lot of companies out there that simply don't share our Christian values. The good news is we do not have to invest in them. At 48 Financial, they specialize in biblically responsible investing. They'll help you screen out companies that go against your faith. That go against your values? And they'll help you create a plan that's tailored to your specific goals. They handle the heavy lifting. All you have to do is complete an easy assessment. So that you can focus on what really matters. So if you want to see if your current investments or to what degree they align with your values, Take the simple assessment@48financial.com todd that's 48financial.com todd48financial because your values matter, my friends, and so does your money.
Todd Huff: All right. I referenced this clip a couple of times earlier. Representative J. Paul. Addressing pam. Bondi, wanting her to turn and to apologize to the victims. Which again, it's just the spectacle. This is not how adults behave. But this is. This gets applause by people on the left and. And candidly, sometimes things like this get applause from the right. I have got no problem. If a representative goes after someone who's being evasive and not answering questions. This happens all the time. This happens all the time. And, and people like Senator Kennedy, when this is in the Senate, do a great job of exposing it and holding people accountable. And I think the right, the right way. This is not. This is spectacle. What you're about to hear here. And not only that, it's. It's worth noting that, remember the main complaint against Pam Bondi? And Cash Patel and the administration here is that they haven't released the Epstein files. They've covered up something.
Todd Huff: Now, if you listen to what Representative J. Paul's saying, She's saying that they've released too much information that's harmed the victims further. Again. The purpose here? Is for her to inflict harm on Pam Bondi, on Republicans. Trying to hammer home the point that they've caused all this. They're not fit for office. Vote for us. In November. That's where this is headed. So here's Congresswoman Jaya Paul making her comments to Pam Bondi during her five minutes of questioning during the hearing yesterday. Attorney general bondi. You apologize to the survivors in your opening statement for what they went through at the hands of Jeffrey Epstein. Will you turn to them now and apologize for what your Department of Justice has put them through with the. UN Absolutely unacceptable release. Of the Epstein files and their information.
Todd Huff: So again, turn around and apologize. Right. She already admitted that she'd apologized to them. For what they went through, they should be. Apologized too. Pam Bonnie didn't do create the mess. And where were previous departments of justice on this? There's crickets. Why didn't Democrats listen? Why didn't they care about this in the past? They suddenly care about this again for obvious. For obvious reasons. There were again some other fireworks. Pam Bondi. This is a short clip of Pam Bonnie going after Representative Jamie Raskin, referencing his as many Congress members of Congress have a very incredible, very stellar record when it comes to stock trading. She made this comment. During her testimony. Ashley was being, you know, attacked by people like Raskin as well. The dow was over $50,000. I don't know why you're laughing. You're a great stock trader, as I hear. Raskin, the dow is over 50,000 right now.
Todd Huff: Yeah. She says you're a great stock trader. Why are you. Why are you laughing at what I'm saying here? You. I mean, you're benefiting from. From this again. This is just the spectacle that it's. That it's become. I don't. Again, I don't have problems with. With, you know, calling people out. Referencing some of the other shenanigans. You know, I. I both think there should be a certain amount of respect in the halls of Congress while at the same time. Not so much respect where we don't pretend that we see. What's really going on in Congress and some of these questions, as it's been said before, in the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king, my friends. And we have people that are spiritually and. And politically and culturally blind, or they're doing intentionally, sometimes intentionally so. Blinded by their own ambitions, Personal. Personal enrichment, personal power, party preference. And what's the cost of that? The cost of that is that victims in this case are paying the price. Friends, I've got to go. I hope you have a wonderful weekend. We'll see you on Monday. SDG.
